Post: #31

(09-09-2011 4:09 PM)JAYCEE Wrote:  I assumed group buys were ok. If it's not okay I don't want to do it. I'm having good luck with what I'm doing right now anyway.

Same here.

Talk to you soon.

Post: #32

why not get cheaper stuff instead?

maybe a few of the less pricey ones can combine into a similar prog ?

Post: #33

(09-09-2011 12:32 PM)Ryan Wrote:  Seriously, get a fucking job and buy the damn thing yourself, it's worth it! ;)

what if i need it to get a job?

Post: #34

I have been making some "research" about this company and the guy who is hiding behind it, Shannon Matteson, and I will be very happy to stay away from it...

Post: #35

@NewAlpha - You've roused my curiosity...

Post: #36

Share please

Post: #37

Just go read posts on catlords Panty Scorcher mix over at the other PT, and how when members said it wasn't doing anything for them, catlord always told them it was their fault. I mean come on folks, his calculator told him..... And that calculator can't be wrong, right?

Read threads where he is responding to members with his arrogant, better than thou attitude. In fact go find anything he posted that was actually a valuable contribution and didn't make him come across as a conceited jerk.

Post: #38

All i know now is hes a red-head certificate-less idiot

No harm has been done, so s*** m* d*** =)

Post: #39

OH, I alomost forgot: I was speaking with a good friend just the other day and those tapes came up. Out of respect I won't say his name, but most of you also know and respect him. Anyway, he said he noticed that the messages contained negative reinforcements, and he confronted Shannon as to the reason he would attempt to implant negative thoughts into subliminal tapes. He got a runaround reply something to the effect of "Because we wanted to address them before they came up".

I don't claim to know much about psychology or how the brain functions on a subliminal basis, but one I've read over and over is that if you are trying to alter your behavior you do so using only positive reinforcement, and that negative reinforcement does NOT work.

Post: #40

@mark: can u plz show me an example of negative reinforcement ? This seems dodgy as.