Post: #1

i don't know if this true or not but lot of article explaining it, anyway im Pheromone user and i believe that human pheromones & putative exist

Post: #2

They are writing it to make sure that no one uses it, only them, you must think this is a good news and they are doing us a favor by keeping it a secret.

Post: #3

Yeah in the ABC Radio interview I put up a while back, that guy said that our olfactory systems have shut down and we can no longer smell pheromones. We are more complex creatures now. But with what I have read here and experienced for myself (though I am hard on actual hits, I do notice mone related experiences daily) I just can't believe this to be true. I am happy that science disqualifies mones as it keeps it as an edge product that most won't allow themselves to have access to because they are not willing to experience life for themselves, rather being told what works and what does not. Leon226 is probably right, they probably do suppress this info to sell other products (colognes etc). Good for us!

Post: #4

(05-30-2015 8:02 AM)phero hacker Wrote:  Yeah in the ABC Radio interview I put up a while back, that guy said that our olfactory systems have shut down and we can no longer smell pheromones.

I believe that what they're probably referring to is the vomeronasal organ (VNO), which is the organ responsible for pheromonal signal transmission in reptile and mammal animal species where pheromones do play a large role. There is debate about whether the VNO actually even still exists in humans and of those that believe it does most of them still consider the VNO to be a vestigial organ with no active nerve or axon connections to the brain.

Let them continue to discount and debate all they want, those of us that use pheromones know better, regardless of whether it's the VNO, some other part of the olfactory system, or faeries that the are responsible for their transmission.

Post: #5

YES Mark in Dallas, i've read the same thing somewhere they just don't know whether is VNO responsible from transmitting signals to the brain or other parts in the human body. but the whole existence of pheromones relay to that part, which i think isn't discovered yet, Pheromones will still remain discreet subject & out of public.

Post: #6

Human VNO is inactive and 95% of our DNA is junk.....yyyyeeeeaaaa.....

Post: #7

There is the same kind of polemic about e-cigarette. According to some "expert", there is no "hard proof" of its efficiency to quit smoking, despite countless blogs, forums, facebook groups or comments from users in press articles and a fast growing vaping community.

The same about the supposed toxicity of the device, based on unrealistic uses of the device or flawed in vitro studies (like "The effect of pure nicotine on lung cells exposed for 24 hours").

That led me to reconsider the importance of intellectual honesty in the scientific community.

Post: #8

(07-21-2015 12:10 PM)octopupus Wrote:  There is the same kind of polemic about e-cigarette. According to some "expert", there is no "hard proof" of its efficiency to quit smoking, despite countless blogs, forums, facebook groups or comments from users in press articles and a fast growing vaping community.

The same about the supposed toxicity of the device, based on unrealistic uses of the device or flawed in vitro studies (like "The effect of pure nicotine on lung cells exposed for 24 hours").

Smoke Juice has been found to contain Propylene glycol, an ingredient used in Anti-Freeze. Now for the small print: It is added to the anti-freeze to make it LESS TOXIC. It is also an ingredient in the albuterol nebulizers that asthmatics have been huffing on for decades.

After smoking 1 1/2 to 2 packs a day of Marlboro 100's for 38 years and being able to give it up 3 days after buying my first QUALITY eCig, and having helped at least a dozen other smokers switch to eCigs and kick the habit, that's proof enough for me.

As to the flawed studies, here are a couple of abstracts from ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (PubMed.gov) that the Anti Tobacco advocates don't want to get out:

Secondhand exposure to vapors from electronic cigarettes.

Quote:Results: The study showed that e-cigarettes are a source of secondhand exposure to nicotine but not to combustion toxicants. The air concentrations of nicotine emitted by various brands of e-cigarettes ranged from 0.82 to 6.23 µg/m(3). The average concentration of nicotine resulting from smoking tobacco cigarettes was 10 times higher than from e-cigarettes (31.60±6.91 vs. 3.32±2.49 µg/m(3), respectively; p = .0081).

Conclusions: Using an e-cigarette in indoor environments may involuntarily expose nonusers to nicotine but not to toxic tobacco-specific combustion products. More research is needed to evaluate health consequences of secondhand exposure to nicotine, especially among vulnerable populations, including children, pregnant women, and people with cardiovascular conditions

Acute effects of electronic and tobacco cigarette smoking on complete blood count.

Quote:Abstract: The World Health Organisation called for research assessing the safety of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette). We evaluated the acute effect of active and passive e-cigarette and tobacco cigarette smoking on complete blood count (CBC) markers in 15 smokers and 15 never-smokers, respectively. Smokers underwent a control session, an active tobacco cigarette smoking session, and an active e-cigarette smoking session. Never-smokers underwent a control session, a passive tobacco cigarette smoking session, and a passive e-cigarette smoking session. The results demonstrated that CBC indices remained unchanged during the control session and the active and passive e-cigarette smoking sessions (P>0.05). Active and passive tobacco cigarette smoking increased white blood cell, lymphocyte, and granulocyte counts for at least one hour in smokers and never smokers (P<0.05). It is concluded that acute active and passive smoking using the e-cigarettes tested in the current study does not influence CBC indices in smokers and never smokers, respectively. In contrast, acute active and passive tobacco cigarette smoking increase the secondary proteins of acute inflammatory load for at least one hour. More research is needed to evaluate chemical safety issues and other areas of consumer product safety of e-cigarettes, because the nicotine content in the liquids used may vary considerably.

Post: #9

This is a very old game from media my friend. They do this to protect or to make sure that it doesn't get out of control... Imagine if every single person is using pheromones... That means any where you go it will be OD so many mones at the same place is no good for sure