Post: #1

These two compounds are often used interchangeably in discussion, but I think this is just out of misunderstanding. Androtics sells MethoxyestratetraeNONE as "MEO - E S T" (I hate the forum's auto-replace), and this is also what True uses in their TrueLove formula.

Many users have tested and reported on MethoxyestratetraeNONE over the years, but I'm not aware of anyone having ever reported on MethoxyestratetraeNOL. It looks like True has it for sale in their single molecules section.

Has anyone ever used this substance?

Post: #2

I was wondering this as well...

but the price is a bit stiff to invest now ....

Pago

Post: #3

(07-26-2011 2:20 PM)dbot Wrote:  Has anyone ever used this substance?

I havnt but but im sure if you ask Jack Slater he will tell you everything you need to know

Post: #4

I will be ordering Meo-Nol soon - again my curiousity gets the best of me, I wonder if it would stack with Meo-none

Post: #5

This looks to be a slightly old thread revived, but I'm glad it was; it gave me a reason to make my first post. There seems to be a lot of confusion with the naming of estratetraenol-like molecules. True pheromones calls equillin "estratetraenONE" while it strikes me that this is incorrect. It could be described as HYDROXYestratetraenone or estratetraenolone. Better yet, when being used in context of humans, should be called 7-dehydroestrone. What should be called estratetraenone is estra-1,3,5(10),16-tetraen-3-one, to which I can't find any reference anywhere.
All of this makes me wonder: what molecule are we calling methoxyestratetraenone? Or methoxyestratetraenol for that matter? One of the reasons I've moved on from androtics' unnamed proprietary molecules is that I like to know what I'm spraying on my body.

Post: #6

Hi there DH...

that´s very interesting info ...

seems that you have some scientific background on chemistry .. ?

ahemm ..

and welcome to the board btw ..

Pago

Post: #7

Thanks. I have basic knowledge in genchem and organic chem.
Also, from what I've gathered about pheromone structure, if equilin has pheromone effects in humans, estrone likely will too. Since they both likely have similar estrogenic effects (equilin may be stronger), I wonder if anyone has tried estrone.
Considering the concern over xenoestrogens these days, I wonder if both are a bad idea. I think sticking to delta16 (double bond c16-17, like E-nol, Androstadienone ) molecules when it comes to estrogen derivatives is a better idea.

(01-20-2013 2:15 PM)Pagodeiro Wrote:  Hi there DH...

that´s very interesting info ...

seems that you have some scientific background on chemistry .. ?

ahemm ..

and welcome to the board btw ..

Pago

Post: #8

Never tried estrone but i´d love to get my hands on it ..

all that Androsterone variants seem to work really nice as a pheromone ..

i have Equlin from True ( or whatever it is ) and tryed it a few times ... seems to have some calming effects ..

Pago

Post: #9

Well, I wouldn't recommend it, but if you wanted to try estrone sulfate, it's one of the estrogens in Premarin (along with equilin sulfate and equilenin sulfate). I'm sure one of those international pharmacy websites would be a cheap source. Looks like 17.5mg is about 22USD.

Post: #10

(01-20-2013 3:15 PM)DrHorrible Wrote:  Well, I wouldn't recommend it, but if you wanted to try estrone sulfate, it's one of the estrogens in Premarin (along with equilin sulfate and equilenin sulfate). I'm sure one of those international pharmacy websites would be a cheap source. Looks like 17.5mg is about 22USD.

Post a link please
Thanks in advance
kmacc